Either Iran stops, or it will be attacked, PM to tell Obama |
The next 48 hours will be critical for Israel, U.S.
coordination on Iran • Presidents Peres and Obama set to address members of
AIPAC • On Monday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will ask Obama to present
an ultimatum to Iran, and quickly.
Shlomo Cesana, Lior Jacoby and News Agencies
Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper on
Friday.
|
Photo credit: AP |
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. President
Barack Obama are scheduled to meet on Monday in Washington to discuss the
Iranian issue and decide what the next steps should be in response to Iran’s
push toward uranium enrichment and potential acquisition of nuclear weapons.
Israeli officials reiterated on Friday that Iran was biding its time while it
continued to develop nuclear weapons. U.S. government officials, on the other
hand, have been sending Israel a message to forget about 2012, and focus on next
year as far as plans for more forceful measures against Iran.
It is believed that in his meeting with Obama on Monday
morning, Netanyahu will say that the U.S. must present an ultimatum to Iran
immediately and tell the Iranian government that if it does not comply with the
conditions of the ultimatum, the only remaining option will be a military
strike.
In a press conference together with Canadian Prime
Minister Steven Harper on Friday, Netanyahu outlined what he believed should be
said to the Iranians: “They must shut down their facility near Qom, stop their
uranium enrichment program and transfer all the material they have outside their
country. And when I say all the material, I mean all the material, from 3.5% and
up,” Netanyahu said.
Netanyahu added that the ultimatum should have a short
timetable since time was running out to stop Iran’s nuclear program. “Each day
is bringing the danger closer, and we understand that the worst may happen,” he
said. “What we have warned against may soon become reality. The Iranians could
do again what they have done before, they could pursue or exploit the talks as
they have done in the past to deceive and delay so that they can continue to
advance their nuclear program and get to the nuclear finish line by running up
the clock, so to speak. I think the international community should not fall into
this trap.”
Meanwhile, in a report in Sunday's New York Times entitled
"Israel's backers in AIPAC Press Obama to Harden Iran
Policy," White House correspondent Mark Landler wrote that several
high-level U.S. intelligence sources are reporting that Iran has no intention of
further pursuing nuclear weapons development. "Recent accessments by American
spy agencies have reaffirmed intelligence findings in 2007 and 2010 that
concluded that Iran had abandoned its nuclear weapons program," Landler
wrote.
The same New York Times report also said that Obama has no plans "to lay down new red lines on Iran," and that he was neither ready nor willing to sanction an attack on Iran in order to prevent it from getting to the point where it could manufacture a nuclear weapon.
Commenting on the sanctions against Iran during Friday's press conference, Netanyahu said, “Iran is suffering now due to the economic sanctions and will perhaps agree to talks. We all want to achieve a peaceful solution that will result in Iran relinquishing its nuclear program. I have not drawn red lines, and I will not draw red lines for the U.S. We want to preserve Israel’s operative independence against threats of removing us from the global map.”
The same New York Times report also said that Obama has no plans "to lay down new red lines on Iran," and that he was neither ready nor willing to sanction an attack on Iran in order to prevent it from getting to the point where it could manufacture a nuclear weapon.
Commenting on the sanctions against Iran during Friday's press conference, Netanyahu said, “Iran is suffering now due to the economic sanctions and will perhaps agree to talks. We all want to achieve a peaceful solution that will result in Iran relinquishing its nuclear program. I have not drawn red lines, and I will not draw red lines for the U.S. We want to preserve Israel’s operative independence against threats of removing us from the global map.”
Harper told Netanyahu, “We, of course, recognize the right
of Israel to defend itself as a sovereign state, as a Jewish state. That said,
we want to see a peaceful resolution of this issue. And we want to see every
action taken to get a peaceful resolution of the situation.”
Israeli officials expressed concern on Friday that the
U.S. did not intend to place a time limit on possible upcoming talks with Iran.
Although the U.S. has made it clear that the military option will be used if
sanctions do not force Iran to abandon its nuclear program, U.S. officials have
asked Israel to drop its urgency to operate militarily against Iran in 2012.
Israeli officials have recently stated that both Israel
and the U.S. are in possession of identical information on the status of Iran’s
nuclear progress and have also arrived at the same conclusions on the matter,
which to Israeli officials means the reason the U.S. is not pushing the issue
more urgently is due to the U.S. presidential election year.
U.S. officials responded however, that it was not the
upcoming election that was holding them back, but rather the current
parliamentary elections and future presidential elections in Iran. According to
U.S. officials, a significant rift is appearing among Iran’s leaders, and
especially between Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad, which to the U.S. indicates that the sanctions are working.
After a recent visit to the U.S. by Defense Minister Ehud
Barak, during which he met with U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, Vice
President Joe Biden, National Security Adviser Tom Donilon and Director of
National Intelligence James Clapper, Israeli officials claimed that the gaps
between the two country’s positions were significantly smaller than the picture
painted by the media, and the U.S. was preparing its military option against
Iran now more than ever.
Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, currently visiting
Bulgaria, said on Friday, “We cannot make peace with an Iranian regime that
supports terrorism and is busy acquiring nuclear weapons capability. The
international community must prove that it can handle this situation
effectively. The sanctions imposed on Iran constitute a step in the right
direction, but they still have not caused Iran’s leaders to give up their
nuclear program.”
In an interview with French newspaper Le Monde on Friday,
Deputy Prime Minister Dan Meridor (Likud) said that sanctions against Iran could
work if the pressure was raised enough. Meridor said that if the U.S. made Iran
its top priority, it could convince the Russians to join in and also impose
sanctions against Iran.
In an interview with the U.S.-based Atlantic newspaper published on
Saturday, Obama was quoted as saying, “I think that the Israeli government
recognizes that, as president of the United States, I don’t bluff. I also don’t,
as a matter of sound policy, go around advertising exactly what our intentions
are. But I think both the Iranian and the Israeli governments recognize that
when the United States says it is unacceptable for Iran to have a nuclear
weapon, we mean what we say.”
Commenting on claims that the president does not sincerely
support Israel’s position on Iran, Obama told the Atlantic, “Every single
commitment I have made to the state of Israel and its security, I have kept. Why
is it that despite me never failing to support Israel on every single problem
that they’ve had over the last three years, that there are still questions about
that?”
Obama reportedly questioned a military response to Iran’s
nuclear progress, saying, “At a time when there is not a lot of sympathy for
Iran and its only real ally [Syria] is on the ropes, do we want a distraction in
which suddenly Iran can portray itself as a victim?”
On his relationship with Netanyahu, Obama said, “One thing
that I have found in working with Prime Minister Netanyahu is that we can be
very frank with each other, very blunt with each other, very honest with each
other. For the most part, when we have differences, they are tactical and not
strategic.”
As international pressure mounts against Tehran, and
Israeli and U.S. officials continue to meet and discuss ways to curb Iran’s
nuclear ambitions, Turkey is set to join in and try its hand at stopping Iran’s
nuclear program. Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan will fly to Tehran
at the end of the month and meet with the Iranian leadership to discuss the
nuclear issue, Erdogan’s political adviser said on Saturday.
Erdogan is scheduled to visit Iran after a two-day
international nuclear security summit in Seoul, South Korea, starting March 26.
The Turkish prime minister will reportedly meet Khamenei and Ahmadinejad and
discuss the topic of resuming talks with the West, which ended one year
ago.
No comments:
Post a Comment