| ||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||
|
PM Netanyahu to Cabinet on situation in south: "Last Friday, an arch-terrorist who organized many attacks against the State of Israel was eliminated." IDF Spokesperson
Zuhir Kaisi, born in 1963, from Gaza City, was the head of the Popular Resistance Committee terror organization and was also its political commander. Kaisi was among the leaders who planned, funded, and directed the combined terror attack that took place on Route 12 in August 2011, in which 40 people were wounded. Kaisi was also involved in rocket fire at Israel, as well as in the attack on the Nahal Oz fuel terminal in April 2008, in which two Israeli citizens were killed. In addition, Kaisi was in charge of transferring funds from Hizbullah to terror organizations in the Gaza Strip. Following the strike, terrorist organizations in the Gaza Strip launched a rocket and mortar barrage directly targeting Israeli civilians. The barrage is currently ongoing. On Friday night, IAF aircraft targeted two weapon manufactoring facilities and two rocker launching sites in the nothern Gaza Strip, a weapon manufactoring sites in the central Gaza Strip and a terror activity sites in the southern Gaza Strip. The targeting was in direct response to the rockets fired at Israeli southern communities. In addition IAF aircraft targeted a terrorist in the central Gaza Strip and six addtional terrorist squads who were in the final stages of preparing to fire rockets at Israel from separate locations in the nothern and central Gaza Stirp. On March 10, in response of the ongoing rocket fire at Israel, IAF aircraft targeted two terror activity sites in the northern and southern Gaza Strip, and a weapon storage facility in the northern Gaza Strip. On Sunday morning (March 11), IAF aircraft targeted a terrorist at a rocket launching site in the northern Gaza Strip from which two rockets were fired at the city of Ashdod a short time beforehand, and later targeted a terrorist, moments before he was to fire a Grad rocket at the city of Ashdod. | ||||||||||||||||
Showing posts with label katsav. Show all posts
Showing posts with label katsav. Show all posts
Sunday, March 11, 2012
Dal sito del Ministero degli Affari Esteri Israeliani
Summary of Overnight Events
Summary of Overnight Events
Overnight, IAF aircraft targeted a terrorist squad that was in the final stages of preparing to fire rockets at Israel from the northern Gaza Strip.
In addition, a short while ago, IAF aircraft targeted two rocket launching sites, in the northern Gaza Strip, used by terror organizations to fire medium-range rockets into Israel (over 40 kilometers).
Direct hits were identified.
The IDF is prepared to defend the residents of Israel and will respond with strength and determination against any attempt to execute terrorist attacks. Hamas uses other terror organizations to carry out terror attacks against the State of Israel and will bear the consequences of these actions in any future operation embarked upon by the IDF in order to eliminate the terror threat and restore the relative calm to the area.
For real time information follow @idfspokesperson on Twitter, or subscribe to the IDF Facebook page.
All new information can be found in the updating post: Israel Under Fire: More Than 130 Rockets Fired From Gaza at Israel
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
From the Jewish Voice
At Pro-Israel Conference, Republicans and Democrats Trade Barbs Over Obama’s Record
Wednesday, 07 March 2012 18:14 Analysis by Jacob Kornbluh
in
Share
“The current administration has distanced itself from Israel and visibly warmed to the Palestinian cause,” Mitt Romney, current Republican front-runner, told the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. (Photo credit: Jeff Malet – www.maletphoto.com)
The race to the White House in an incumbent year, is always referred as a referendum on the sitting President’s record. But this year, as the battle for the Jewish vote is growing into a heated debate, both sides are using the same method to win the argument. While the President is urging the pro-Israel community to take a close look at his record, his Republican contenders are highlighting that same record as proof of failure on the president’s part, and indicative of an historic low point in the unique American-Israel relationship.
While the theme of this year’s policy conference was centered on America and Israel’s shared values, the differences on policies, which have a profound effect on both Israel’s security and U.S.-Israeli relations, could not have been more visible.
The line that every speaker on the podium or at the breakout sessions repeatedly reiterated, was – “Israel’s security is unshakable,” and that “Iran must not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons.” But the approach that each side took as they brandished their pro-Israel credentials and were applauded by the 13,000 Jewish and pro-Israel attendees, attested to a partisan battle over the degree of American commitment to Israel and its security.
The most noticeable difference between this year and the last was President Obama’s record on Israel with regard to Iran heading into a heated election cycle. On one hand, the Republicans are seizing the opportunity to capitalize on Obama’s perceived weakness in this area, tilting the Jewish vote towards the GOP, while the Democrats are aggressively pushing back the critics and defending the president’s record. In a year where every vote could decide the election in swing states with a larger Jewish population, this places President Obama in a somewhat precarious position.
In an attempt to win over disappointed pro-Israel voters, President Obama sought to bolster his position by emphasizing his commitment to Israel. Anxiously proclaiming that his record over the past three years in office is very noticeable, “at every crucial juncture, at every fork in the road, we have been there for Israel. Every single time,” he noted.
“You don’t just have to count on my words. You can look at my deeds,” he said, noting increased U.S. spending on defense aid to Israel, improved sharing by the two nations on intelligence and military matters, and his administration’s support during diplomatic crises in the Middle East.
Not letting the President set the stage and narrative of the argument, The Republican leaders and presidential candidates clearly dismissed that notion, by suggesting that the Obama administration had abandoned Israel by allowing the Islamic regime to go on enriching uranium as one step ahead before obtaining nuclear capabilities.
“This president not only dawdled in imposing crippling sanctions. He has opposed them,” Romney said in his speech on Tuesday.
“The current administration has distanced itself from Israel and visibly warmed to the Palestinian cause,” Mitt Romney, current Republican front-runner, told the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.
“As I’ve sat and watched this play out on the world stage, I have seen a president who has been reticent,” Rick Santorum assailed the President. “He says he has Israel’s back. From everything I’ve seen from the conduct of this administration, he has turned his back on the people of Israel.”
The DNC anticipated the Republican claim by releasing an online video to members of the media and specifically Jewish press and activists that shows Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu saying, “President Obama spoke about his ironclad commitment to Israel’s security. He rightly said that our security cooperation is unprecedented, and he has backed those words with deeds.” The video aims to quell concerns over Obama’s approach to Iran and his commitment to Israel. “The bond between the U.S. and Israel—it’s always been beyond politics. But now Washington Republicans are breaking that tradition,” the voice-over says. “Launching negative ads that the Associated Press says ‘ignore reality.’ The facts? Under President Obama U.S. funding for Israel is at an all-time high. Billions for Israel’s security.”
Another online video included clips of Obama telling AIPAC on Sunday that he, like Romney, would try to prevent Iran from going nuclear.
In a DNC conference call on Tuesday morning, Senator Chuck Schumer defended President Obama’s clear and strong commitment to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear capabilities, and at the same time took a shot at Mitt Romney, saying “Romney’s critics of Obama is a “deliberate distortion of the truth, dishonest and dangerous.” emphasizing that his positions are - “empty rhetoric, which are recklessly dividing Americans. That doesn’t serve the national interest of the U.S. and Israel.”
Robert Wexler, also on the conference call graded Obama’s record on Israel as an A+ - for simply “being there for Israel, at moment when it was greatly needed”.
Matt Brooks, the Executive Director of the Republican Jewish coalition, when asked to respond to the Democrats defense of the President and their dismissal of the Republican criticism, noted that “there is a degree of concern about Iran, not only among Israelis but also among the American Jewish community, as for the resolve of the President to confront the Iranian issue with an effective approach.”
“Basically, the President in his AIPAC speech was advising Israel to hold back on any military action, in order to allow some more time for diplomacy and sanctions to convince the Iranians to abandon their intentions. This has been going on for 10 year and is not working.” And it’s the sole responsibility of Prime Minister, Brooks points out, noting Netanyahu’s commitment that “Israel is unwilling to outsource their own security to anyone, even to its closest ally.”
As for the Jewish vote in the general election, Brooks is convinced that in the battleground states that contain a large amount of Jewish voters, not necessarily historical Republican voters that have voted for Obama in 2008, are now deeply committed in voting for the eventual Republican nominee. And by that, the Republican Party might be able to score electoral victories, all depending on the message and the prime focus of the pro-Israel/Jewish electorate.
Wednesday, 07 March 2012 18:14 Analysis by Jacob Kornbluh
in
Share
“The current administration has distanced itself from Israel and visibly warmed to the Palestinian cause,” Mitt Romney, current Republican front-runner, told the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. (Photo credit: Jeff Malet – www.maletphoto.com)
The race to the White House in an incumbent year, is always referred as a referendum on the sitting President’s record. But this year, as the battle for the Jewish vote is growing into a heated debate, both sides are using the same method to win the argument. While the President is urging the pro-Israel community to take a close look at his record, his Republican contenders are highlighting that same record as proof of failure on the president’s part, and indicative of an historic low point in the unique American-Israel relationship.
While the theme of this year’s policy conference was centered on America and Israel’s shared values, the differences on policies, which have a profound effect on both Israel’s security and U.S.-Israeli relations, could not have been more visible.
The line that every speaker on the podium or at the breakout sessions repeatedly reiterated, was – “Israel’s security is unshakable,” and that “Iran must not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons.” But the approach that each side took as they brandished their pro-Israel credentials and were applauded by the 13,000 Jewish and pro-Israel attendees, attested to a partisan battle over the degree of American commitment to Israel and its security.
The most noticeable difference between this year and the last was President Obama’s record on Israel with regard to Iran heading into a heated election cycle. On one hand, the Republicans are seizing the opportunity to capitalize on Obama’s perceived weakness in this area, tilting the Jewish vote towards the GOP, while the Democrats are aggressively pushing back the critics and defending the president’s record. In a year where every vote could decide the election in swing states with a larger Jewish population, this places President Obama in a somewhat precarious position.
In an attempt to win over disappointed pro-Israel voters, President Obama sought to bolster his position by emphasizing his commitment to Israel. Anxiously proclaiming that his record over the past three years in office is very noticeable, “at every crucial juncture, at every fork in the road, we have been there for Israel. Every single time,” he noted.
“You don’t just have to count on my words. You can look at my deeds,” he said, noting increased U.S. spending on defense aid to Israel, improved sharing by the two nations on intelligence and military matters, and his administration’s support during diplomatic crises in the Middle East.
Not letting the President set the stage and narrative of the argument, The Republican leaders and presidential candidates clearly dismissed that notion, by suggesting that the Obama administration had abandoned Israel by allowing the Islamic regime to go on enriching uranium as one step ahead before obtaining nuclear capabilities.
“This president not only dawdled in imposing crippling sanctions. He has opposed them,” Romney said in his speech on Tuesday.
“The current administration has distanced itself from Israel and visibly warmed to the Palestinian cause,” Mitt Romney, current Republican front-runner, told the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.
“As I’ve sat and watched this play out on the world stage, I have seen a president who has been reticent,” Rick Santorum assailed the President. “He says he has Israel’s back. From everything I’ve seen from the conduct of this administration, he has turned his back on the people of Israel.”
The DNC anticipated the Republican claim by releasing an online video to members of the media and specifically Jewish press and activists that shows Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu saying, “President Obama spoke about his ironclad commitment to Israel’s security. He rightly said that our security cooperation is unprecedented, and he has backed those words with deeds.” The video aims to quell concerns over Obama’s approach to Iran and his commitment to Israel. “The bond between the U.S. and Israel—it’s always been beyond politics. But now Washington Republicans are breaking that tradition,” the voice-over says. “Launching negative ads that the Associated Press says ‘ignore reality.’ The facts? Under President Obama U.S. funding for Israel is at an all-time high. Billions for Israel’s security.”
Another online video included clips of Obama telling AIPAC on Sunday that he, like Romney, would try to prevent Iran from going nuclear.
In a DNC conference call on Tuesday morning, Senator Chuck Schumer defended President Obama’s clear and strong commitment to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear capabilities, and at the same time took a shot at Mitt Romney, saying “Romney’s critics of Obama is a “deliberate distortion of the truth, dishonest and dangerous.” emphasizing that his positions are - “empty rhetoric, which are recklessly dividing Americans. That doesn’t serve the national interest of the U.S. and Israel.”
Robert Wexler, also on the conference call graded Obama’s record on Israel as an A+ - for simply “being there for Israel, at moment when it was greatly needed”.
Matt Brooks, the Executive Director of the Republican Jewish coalition, when asked to respond to the Democrats defense of the President and their dismissal of the Republican criticism, noted that “there is a degree of concern about Iran, not only among Israelis but also among the American Jewish community, as for the resolve of the President to confront the Iranian issue with an effective approach.”
“Basically, the President in his AIPAC speech was advising Israel to hold back on any military action, in order to allow some more time for diplomacy and sanctions to convince the Iranians to abandon their intentions. This has been going on for 10 year and is not working.” And it’s the sole responsibility of Prime Minister, Brooks points out, noting Netanyahu’s commitment that “Israel is unwilling to outsource their own security to anyone, even to its closest ally.”
As for the Jewish vote in the general election, Brooks is convinced that in the battleground states that contain a large amount of Jewish voters, not necessarily historical Republican voters that have voted for Obama in 2008, are now deeply committed in voting for the eventual Republican nominee. And by that, the Republican Party might be able to score electoral victories, all depending on the message and the prime focus of the pro-Israel/Jewish electorate.
Expert: Israel “Testing Ground” for Lawfare
Washington, Mar. 7- Israel is a major target for activists who abuse the Western legal system for political ends, human rights attorney Brooke Goldstein said Wednesday.
“Israeli s the number one victim of this kind of lawfare attack,” Goldstein said. Lawfare is the term increasingly used to describe the strategic manipulation of legal systems for political or military ends.
In a conference call sponsored by The Israel Project, Goldstein discussed how activists around use lawfare to delegitimize Israel and silence who speak out against radical Islam.
Goldstein is the director of The Lawfare Project, which raises awareness and facilitates a response to lawfare.
Israel is singled out in an overwhelming number of UN human rights resolutions and Israeli officials abroad have been targeted by activists for arrest in a practice known as “universal jurisdiction,” a practice Goldstein says is widely abused.
“The people who use it don’t understand the purposes of it,” Goldstein said, and urged Israel “to go on the offense, asserting its right in international courts of law.”
Current defense minister Ehud Barak and current Kadima Party Leader Tzipi Livni have both been the target of attempted prosecutions during visits to the United Kingdom by Palestinian activists using universal jurisdiction in recent years. Both
Israel’s harassment in Western judicial systems has inspired those want to spread the phenomenon of lawfare in other political arenas, Goldstein said.
“It’d be a great shame to think this doesn’t have other consequences,” Goldstein said. “Israel is merely a legal testing ground.”
The Palestinian Authority, which last fall made a unilateral bid for statehood recognition at the United Nations, has threatened to use legal bodies like the International Criminal Court to prosecute Israel for military actions in the Palestinian territories. In October, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, despite pressure from Israel and the United States, accepted Palestine as a member. Many commentators saw the admission of the PA as a gateway for the Palestinians to other world bodies, including the ICC.
Goldstein also pointed to the questionable legality behind the Goldstone Report as an example of lawfare, which singled out Israel for criticism rather than the terrorist group Hamas for the Israeli military’s actions in Gaza in late 2008 and 2009. The namesake and lead author, Justice Richard Goldstone, later said in a Washington Post Op-Ed that he regretted the final document.
Most troubling about lawfare, however, is the legal cover it provides to terrorists, Goldstein said.
“We send a green light to these types of terrorists, they’re going to keep doing what they’re doing because we’re not going against them,” she said.
More information:
Palestinians Seeking to Avoid Talks by Joining More UN Agencies
“Israeli s the number one victim of this kind of lawfare attack,” Goldstein said. Lawfare is the term increasingly used to describe the strategic manipulation of legal systems for political or military ends.
In a conference call sponsored by The Israel Project, Goldstein discussed how activists around use lawfare to delegitimize Israel and silence who speak out against radical Islam.
Goldstein is the director of The Lawfare Project, which raises awareness and facilitates a response to lawfare.
Israel is singled out in an overwhelming number of UN human rights resolutions and Israeli officials abroad have been targeted by activists for arrest in a practice known as “universal jurisdiction,” a practice Goldstein says is widely abused.
“The people who use it don’t understand the purposes of it,” Goldstein said, and urged Israel “to go on the offense, asserting its right in international courts of law.”
Current defense minister Ehud Barak and current Kadima Party Leader Tzipi Livni have both been the target of attempted prosecutions during visits to the United Kingdom by Palestinian activists using universal jurisdiction in recent years. Both
Israel’s harassment in Western judicial systems has inspired those want to spread the phenomenon of lawfare in other political arenas, Goldstein said.
“It’d be a great shame to think this doesn’t have other consequences,” Goldstein said. “Israel is merely a legal testing ground.”
The Palestinian Authority, which last fall made a unilateral bid for statehood recognition at the United Nations, has threatened to use legal bodies like the International Criminal Court to prosecute Israel for military actions in the Palestinian territories. In October, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, despite pressure from Israel and the United States, accepted Palestine as a member. Many commentators saw the admission of the PA as a gateway for the Palestinians to other world bodies, including the ICC.
Goldstein also pointed to the questionable legality behind the Goldstone Report as an example of lawfare, which singled out Israel for criticism rather than the terrorist group Hamas for the Israeli military’s actions in Gaza in late 2008 and 2009. The namesake and lead author, Justice Richard Goldstone, later said in a Washington Post Op-Ed that he regretted the final document.
Most troubling about lawfare, however, is the legal cover it provides to terrorists, Goldstein said.
“We send a green light to these types of terrorists, they’re going to keep doing what they’re doing because we’re not going against them,” she said.
More information:
Palestinians Seeking to Avoid Talks by Joining More UN Agencies
White House: U.S Won’t Attend ‘Durban III'
Monday, March 5, 2012
Dal sito Al Jazeera
| Netanyahu: Israel to make its own decisions |
Israeli prime minister tells US president that his country reserves the right to act unilaterally against Iran.
|
Netanyahu said that Israel reserved the 'sovereign right' to act against Iran [EPA]
|
| Israel "reserves the right" to act unilaterally against Iran's nuclear programme, Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu told US president Barack Obama on Monday. The two leaders are meeting at the White House for talks that could subdue - or amplify - the growing calls for war with Iran. Both said little in their brief public statements delivered before a longer private meeting, where aides say Netanyahu will push the US government to take a more aggressive stance on Iran's nuclear programme. There has been widespread speculation, in the press and in public statements by Israeli officials, that Israel could attack Iran this summer. The Obama administration has not said whether it would support such a move, and in recent weeks has said it sees no evidence that Iran is building a nuclear weapon. In his statement, Obama largely echoed points he made on Sunday night in an address to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the powerful pro-Israel lobbying group. He said that America "reserves all options" regarding Iran's nuclear programme, but wanted more time to pursue diplomacy. "I know that both the prime minister and I prefer to resolve this diplomatically," he said. "We understand the costs of military action." Netanyahu left the door open to unilateral military action, saying that Israel reserves the "sovereign right" to "defend itself, by itself." Their meeting comes against the backdrop of AIPAC's annual conference; the group's members will fan out across Capitol Hill this week to pressure legislators in the leadup to this year's elections. No 'policy of containment' In his remarks on Monday, and his speech the night before, Obama urged Israel to allow time for sanctions against Iran to work, but promised to leave "all options on the table." "Iran's leaders should understand that I do not have a policy of containment," he said in the AIPAC speech. "I have a policy to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon." Netanyahu's government, and AIPAC's leadership, wanted Obama to go further. The Israeli prime minister wants Obama to lay down "red lines" - a clear statement of when the United States would attack Iran over its nuclear programme. Netanyahu is scheduled to deliver his own speech to the AIPAC conference on Monday night. AIPAC, meanwhile, is circulating flyers which describe an Iran with even the capability to build nuclear weapons as "unacceptable." Any country with a well-developed peaceful nuclear programme has a degree of "breakout capacity," the ability to quickly build a nuclear device. AIPAC's position, which is shared by many in Netanyahu's inner circle, would call for a strike on Iran once its nuclear programme reached a certain point, even if the Iranian leadership was not actively building a nuclear weapon. James Clapper, the US director of national intelligence, testified before Congress in January that he believed Iran had not yet decided whether or not to build a bomb. International negotiations over Iran's nuclear programme have been stalled for more than a year, but the Iranian government abruptly announced last month that it would be willing to resume talks without any preconditions. Israeli officials want Iran to completely suspend its uranium enrichment programme before the West resumes negotiations. But the White House has apparently rejected that demand, which Iran would almost certainly refuse; Obama told AIPAC he still believed a diplomatic solution was possible. 'Dating teenagers' The Obama-Netanyahu meeting has been the subject of intense speculation in the Israeli and American press. Yediot Aharonot called it "Netanyahu's moment of truth," forcing the Israeli prime minister to decide whether to support Obama or "collide" with him. The Jerusalem Post likened the two world leaders to courting teenagers, "sending messages to each other through emissaries before their big rendezvous." Gideon Levy, a columnist for the liberal newspaper Ha'aretz, argued that Netanyahu's aggressive lobbying on Iran could eventually undercut US support for Israel. "Netanyahu's Israel has dictated the global agenda as no small state has ever done before, just as its international standing is at its nadir and its dependence on the United States at a zenith," he wrote. Obama sought to tone down some of that speculation during his AIPAC speech; Netanyahu, too, has reportedly instructed his aides to stop talking to the press about Iran. "Already there is too much loose talk of war," Obama said. "For the sake of Israel's security, America's security, and the peace and security of the world, now is not the time for bluster." The Iranian nuclear programme has also become an election-year issue in the United States, where all of the Republican presidential candidates have been sharply critical of Obama's approach to Iran. Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, the front-runner in the Republican primary race, told an audience shortly after the president's speech that "if Barack Obama is re-elected, Iran will have a nuclear weapon." Three of the Republican candidates - Romney, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum - will address the AIPAC conference on Tuesday. |
Source:
Al Jazeera
|
Navon Katsav message!
ראש הממשלה נתניהו צודק, הנאום של הנשיא אובמה, ואני אוסיף, שגם הנאום של הנשיא
פרס, ששניהם נשאו אמש בפני יהודי ארצות הברית, בשנת הבחירות לנשיאות ארצות הברית,
אכן ראויים להערכה ולהוקרה רבה. אולם, יחד עם זאת, הרי שמאחר ואיראן לא הסתירה,
ואינה מסתירה את כוונתה למחוק את ישראל מהמפה, הרי שאסור למדינת ישראל לקחת סיכון
שאירן תהיה גרעינית, ולאפשר ניסוי והימור נוסף בחיי העם היהודי, כפי שכבר נעשה בעבר
בהסכם אוסלו, עליו חתום הנשיא פרס, , וכן גם בתוכנית ההינתקות. שכן כעת מונחת על כף
המאזניים שאלת קיומה הממשי והפיזי ממש של מדינת ישראל , וחלילה שואה נוספת , אותה
מנע בזמנו מנחם בגין ז"ל ! אשר על כן, העת היא למעשים ופחות לדיבורים. וראוי שכולם
יזכרו תמיד את המשפט הנבון שנאמר על ידי מר אדמונד ברק, הפילוסוף הבריטי ממוצא אירי
ואני מצטט : " העזרה היחידה הנדרשת לשטן כדי לנצח , היא אנשים טובים שאינם עושים
מאומה ". מוגש כחומר למחשבה. המשך יום טוב ושבוע טוב לכולכם.
Netanyahu's right, President Obama's speech, and I'll add, that Peres's speech, both of whom were last night facing American Jews in the U.S. presidential election, indeed to be admired and respected name. But, however, it that since Iran did not hide, and does not hide its intention to wipe Israel off the map, then should not the State of Israel to take the risk that Iran will be nuclear, and allow the trial and additional bet in Jewish life, as has been done before in the Oslo agreement, signed by President Peres ,, as well as the disengagement plan. For now at stake the question of the existence of effective physical right of the State of Israel, and God forbid another Holocaust, it prevented at the time Menachem Begin! As such, the journal is action and less talk. And proper that everyone will always remember the court savvy as it is written by Mr. Edmund Barak, the British philosopher Irish and I quote: "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is good men do nothing". served as food for thought. continuation good day and good week to you all their.
Netanyahu's right, President Obama's speech, and I'll add, that Peres's speech, both of whom were last night facing American Jews in the U.S. presidential election, indeed to be admired and respected name. But, however, it that since Iran did not hide, and does not hide its intention to wipe Israel off the map, then should not the State of Israel to take the risk that Iran will be nuclear, and allow the trial and additional bet in Jewish life, as has been done before in the Oslo agreement, signed by President Peres ,, as well as the disengagement plan. For now at stake the question of the existence of effective physical right of the State of Israel, and God forbid another Holocaust, it prevented at the time Menachem Begin! As such, the journal is action and less talk. And proper that everyone will always remember the court savvy as it is written by Mr. Edmund Barak, the British philosopher Irish and I quote: "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is good men do nothing". served as food for thought. continuation good day and good week to you all their.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)